notifications
category
Polity

Polity Topics

Undergraduate level — Polity

topic
5
Topics
quiz
292
Question bank
star
580
Total marks
description
0
Materials

Choose question count and time — session stays in your browser only.

filter_alt Topics

lock

Constitution

Locked · 50 questions

lock

Fundamental Rights

Locked · 63 questions

lock

Parliament & Legislature

Locked · 50 questions

lock

Local Self Government

Locked · 50 questions

lock

Bihar Governance

Locked · 279 questions

quiz Questions

help

Q291

Article 31C was inserted by the 25th Amendment Act, 1971. The section of Article 31C that barred judicial review over laws declaring implementation of Article 39(b) or (c) was struck down in which case?

1 · 2 marks · MCQ

A.

Minerva Mills v. Union of India

B.

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

C.

Waman Rao v. Union of India

D.

I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu

Explanation

In Kesavananda Bharati, the Supreme Court upheld the first part of Article 31C but struck down its second part, which sought to exclude judicial review by declaring that no court could question whether a law actually furthers the Directive Principles.

help

Q292

Regarding the scope of the writ of Quo Warranto, which of the following locus standi principles is accurate according to Indian jurisprudence?

1 · 2 marks · MCQ

A.

The petitioner must show a direct, personal legal injury caused by the appointment.

B.

It can be maintained only by a rival candidate claiming a preferential right to the public office.

C.

Any member of the public can maintain the petition, even if they have no personal interest or injury in the office.

D.

It is maintainable only when filed by the Attorney General of India.

Explanation

Unlike writs like Certiorari or Mandamus, where the petitioner must show an direct personal injury, Quo Warranto challenges the legal right of a person to a public office. Any member of the public can file it, provided it is a public office of a permanent character.